Digital_Prophet

You keep saying that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.

Wow, trying something new, huh? I definitely haven’t heard this exact same material every election since the 80s! How fresh and new! big ideas! If only somebody would have come up with “more social programs” and “tax corporations and the wealthy” before! I guess nobody thinking of these concepts must be why none of it ever happens, and not because the executive is just one of three branches of the US government so candidates for president can just vomit whatever hopeful fever dreams they want to, knowing full well none of it will ever make it past congress.

I see what you did there.

This is going to make his campaign rallies fucking fabulous. Armies of chuds wearing red hats and shiny gold shoes descending on whatever hee-haw hellscape is hosting Chudcon that week.

This. NYC hated Trump for years before any of the rest of us even knew who he was.

“Becoming” less reliable.

“Biden initiates performative finger waggling with no real consequences or expectations for anyone involved, on twitter.”

At best he’s been inoffensive. He’s a “great” president only in comparison to the last guy.

Huh, unlawful marriage? I wonder what… Oh, religious nonsense. Okay.

Jesus christ, Politico.

Any of those options would make me significantly more interested.

Lol “Id like to push back by linking two youtube videos, one from the hill and the other from RNN.”

We only accept infowars and parler links as legitimate sources, sorry!

edit: And pornhub links!

Whenever I see a story like this I always wonder why I’m not fleecing maga. It’s mostly a question of infrastructure and laziness, I guess.

Our two-party system ensures that as long as one party puts up the worst candidate imaginable we have no choice but to vote for the other. It’s only in times where both candidates are at least average that we can afford to split our votes and potentially elect a candidate from a third, smaller, party. There aren’t enough, or any, protections on our electoral system to keep the two main parties from doing everything they can to hold power, since after all, they would have to be the ones to approve such protections.

Every election year I see people talk about voting for “better candidates” or third party candidates, and I just roll my eyes because our system is working exactly as the two parties intend, and it’s institutionalized to the point where there isnt really any way to change it, short of armed insurrection. I always want to ask if that’s what they are suggesting.

This is the first time in a long time where you can say "no matter who loses, we win," instead of the other way around.

Yes its a real leap to link the people carpet bombing the area with a hospital being bombed.

Yaaar, we had ourselves a good run goin' legit, mateys, but it looks like it be time to hoist the jolly roger again.