I mean, no? In case it wasn't clear from the article, these are the people that voted for this shit. It's also ironic they're already on Medicare (in their 20s) as it is. This should be an 'I get it now' moment for these families, but they'll learn nothing.
Isn’t this the same guy who got shot at some Congress baseball game? Final destination stuff.
It’s 5061 square meters, not feet, Newsweek. That’d make for a pretty small club.
Not sure how you decided this seeing as this benefits people at the poverty line and not the wealthy. Sure, anything can encourage schools to push up tuition prices, but there’s literally a bill in play right now to cap tuition prices. It’s not loan forgiveness, but it’s far better than nothing. Also, the financial impact is a pittance. It’s not the 50k per borrower floated in 2020. It’s not even the 10k the scotus shot down.
Thank you. Was going to be my comment as well. And we’re talking fractions of a percent.
“Goods prices have abated…” The fuck they have. Also stop blaming inflation on wage increase. Most of it was caused by opportunistic greed of those aforementioned ‘goods prices’.
I’m so glad my government is about as good as a Tuesday episode of WWE raw. This is all so incredibly embarrassing.
Just another Tuesday in America.
He’s a single sentence away from inciting another j6.
Since you actually seem to be asking… There is no gerrymandering at the federal level in the presidential election. You could argue that the electoral voting system is somehow a form of this, but it isn’t the same as intentionally drawing districts to mathematically skew the advantage to the party drawing the map. That said, because electoral votes are based upon congressional representation, they do weigh smaller, emptier states more heavily. US senators are entirely free from gerrymandering as they are directly elected by popular vote. Small, empty states do have more power as a result and by design, for better or worse.
This is incredibly fucked up. Handmaid's tale was a documentary.