Well, for him to say it at a “joint Arab League and Organisation of Islamic Cooperation summit”

Said summit has to occur first. Don’t you think?

Your comment is so uneducated I don’t even know where to start. Saudi takes any opportunity then can to criticize Israel. You seriously think THIS is the first time they say anything?

Mythbusters episodes are all over YouTube free for everyone. Just a little FYI in case you feel nostalgic

Doesn’t have to be.

I know why engiseers do what they do. I had to perform my own rituals to appease the machine spirit to run my favorite game on ps2.

I did not worry every second that I allegedly am about to to live in an authoritarian state.

What are you talking about?

I’m not American, but that was fun to watch. I had my popcorn and everything. It felt like I’m watching Cartman debate Wendy or something.

Do you really believe someone who is still undecided going into last night’s debate is a reasonable person?

It’s not just about president it’s about party. Someone might not like Trump. But at the same time dislike democratic policies and democrats as a party.

So now the have to decide. Do they go against Republicans due to their candidate? Hearing Kamala debate him might convince them that yeah… ok. They’re not THAT bad… at least they (democrats) are better than him (Trump)

We cook our food to kill bacteria.

Ever wondered why domesticated animals tend to become much older than wild animals?

Unfortunately, I’ve had plenty of conversations here with people who think exactly this.

So yes, there are people who literally think this.

Not about that. They have some misguided notion that Russia stands for some imaginary form of communism that is the answer to everything.

And everything bad in the world is because of Capitalism. And also, everything west of Russia is “The west” and the entire “the west” is one entity.

It’s a .ml community. What did you expect?

No one would be forced to buy a license from Ford. IF they decide it has to be on every car, and it’s that specific system, they would have to buy it out from Ford.

But legislation like that doesn’t happen over night. It’s planned several years in advance so everyone has time to implement it.

But if that’s what you’re worries about. I suggest you vote for whomever is opposed to it. And if no one is opposed. I suggest you protest.

What is it you want to achieve in this discussion? I know that there is no rule against women playing in the NBA if that’s what you’re asking.

If Brittney Griner is so good that she’s better than NBA players, I’m sure NBA teams would be contracting her instead of WNBA. Good for her. Probably make more money too.

What’s the point you want to make? The WNBA has made a call that it’s cool for her to compete there. I don’t know what you want me to say? It’s a different case in a different sport.

I’m sure the appropriate league will make their determination based on the information available to them.

I don’t see the point in debating a made up scenario of yours where the only information available is the one you’re imagining.

I’m simply informing you that the IBA (International Boxing Association) does do genetic testing. And this woman have been excluded as a result. It has already happened. The debate of which is slightly higher level than the other is pointless and irrelevant

As per what I think. I think women’s sport was created to promote sports for women and boost their participation. And also to give them an equal playingfield. due to men (who are genetically different), often have a physical advantage because of it.

If a woman, have these genetic traits that give men their physical advantages (and I’m speaking in broad, general terms). I can understand if there is a debate about allowing her to compete with other women that doesn’t. It is after all one of the two reasons women’s sports were created in the first place.

It’s an absolute win win.

1. If they patent it, no one else can use the same system in the same way. So it’s contained to Ford.

2. If they don’t end up using it. It’s simply a safeguard that no one else can either.

3. If they do end up using it, people will shy away from Ford, making the roads safer for everyone.

As I said. Win win. This is fantastic news.

They already do genetic testing on the highest level of competition. She’s been excluded by IBA because of it.

Discounted door breachers are.

I guess that’s a problem with trying to have discussion with trolls, they just repeat a script and are unable to engage with the actual points being made.

Couldn’t have said it better myself.