AnonTwo

Did you start with the original Yakuza? Kiwami has a couple things that would feel odd to a newcomer if they don’t play 0, and the only reason you’re skipping Majima Saga here until later is because you moved 0. If you start with 0 then all the context needed for Kiwami 1’s additions and Majima Saga are available.

Plus, to be fair, we have had a massive number of newcomers credit to 0. It’s probably the favorite in the series now.

I mean, they were obviously going to add more modes if they want the game to be AAA. The Original games were basically a 5 minute arcade loop…

It’s the implication. Why would you have problems seeing a disclaimer that not everything in the game is culturally sound? (I just woke up and I can’t remember the correct word but basically…the game has problems, nobody should be uncomfortable that it’s acknowledged)

It makes them look weak.

How?

You seem to have this outlook that because a mod is “silly”, it can’t be removed.

I have the outlook that if it’s so silly nobody should care, then why do you care it was removed?

Not only that, your hyperfixtation on specifically this mod. This is the silly mod you pick.

Am I not supposed to be suspicious that this is the hill you die on? How many small mods get removed from nexusmods on any given day?

If someone cares so much this mod was removed, I am immediately suspicious of that person.

It becomes a question of “How does this benefit you?”

You’ve taken all this time saying “Moderators shouldn’t care”, but then you twist it by saying somebody cares. So why shouldn’t the moderators care?

it’s either a silly mod nobody should care about, or it isn’t. You can’t play both sides to weasel the argument you want.

Yet you care so much about it. Any other “silly” mods you saw pulled today, or just the potentially racist one?

So…did they investigate uvalde yet or no?

Thanks for the clarification

Are these cases required to go to a state court before they’re presented federally?

While it’s good to know, It feels like it’s not relevant whether an individual state’s courts argue it, since foreign policy has to be handled on a federal level.

edit: I’m actually confused. It’s a federal court in California? what sway does it have typically?

It wasn’t the right argument is the issue. Like only the last thing he ever said was directly saying CPC.

Like if thats what we wanted to find out we clearly got the wrong person to ask it.

What is the formatting used to denote strikethrough on lemmy? On Kbin it looks like it’s ignoring it, but it has double tilde as a supported strikethrough formatter.

Pretty sure they’re trying to make “we need more control over the internet” into a national security issue, similar to during the cold war. So basically tie him in with a party people in the US really dislike.

Should’ve gotten Cotton Hill. He’d be an asshole but at least he’d get the nationality right.

Pretty sure Cali wants nothing to do with Texas

I feel like every time someone says this, a federal employee should be allowed to audit the schools that person went to on how the fuck they messed up so badly teaching this failure.

Is it hidden? I remember it being pretty popular when it came out.

On the bright side, it looks (based on what I can tell) that things calmed down and the guy he was talking to took it fairly well.

To be fair in Epsteins case his testifying could’ve probably put some people behind bars. This guy won’t have anymore information now that he’s been pulled away from the system.

deserves the maximum punishment

I literally said the punishment didn’t fit though.

He really shouldn’t. What the guy did was still legally wrong, and he probably knew it and weighed he would rather take jail time and commit it. A less scrupulous person could do worse things, which is why those laws are in place.

If he could somehow reduce the sentence that would be great, and if that is on the table he should, but some punishment should still occur.

He’s a vigilante hero for what he did, but vigilantes are still criminals. The main issue here is that the punishment is clearly wrong, and the message is wrong, as the judge seems to think this is paramount to treason, which it isn’t.