![](/static/23fb711/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/iagF0LDrMp.png)
So many of the results I see are incredibly obvious fakes.
So many of the results I see are incredibly obvious fakes.
Yes, but they were satisfied when IBM was given a license to use JSLint for evil.
But dc
is a reverse polish calculator Unix program. It's even in the Bell Labs' Unix 1st edition manual.
It's designed to be an extended vi clone above anything else.
C was built mostly to abstract from assembly
That’s actually not true; rather, many modern architectures are designed to allow languages like C to be compiled more easily. Old architectures don’t even have a built-in stack.
Ed Is The Standard Text Editor
ed
, ex
, and vi
are all standard, required text editors in the Single Unix Specification.
The last paragraph is completely irrelevant, as it has nothing to do with the ozone layer. You do not want ozone in the troposphere, but you do want it in the stratosphere.
I look forward to finding out how it’s actually much worse than meets the eye. [emphasis added]
It this schadenfreude because you hate Canonical and their Snap system?
[[ is not a POSIX shell feature.
Cow milk tasting much better than alternatives (which I do very strongly agree with) is not exactly a good argument for dairy subsidies.
It’s not shelf stable. It has a short lifespan.
Ultra-pasteurized milk has a remarkable shelf life, even when unrefrigerated.
And how is it better for us? Considering a majority of the world can’t digest it is a big sign as to why plant based is better.
Your argument becomes a non-sequitur when extended to people who are lactose tolerant. The mere existence or ubiquity of lactose intolerance does not entail that milk is bad for the lactose tolerant. Perhaps plant substitutes to cow milk are better for even the lactose tolerant, but lactose intolerance is completely irrelevant to the minority of us such as myself who produce sufficient enzymes to digest lactose without any difficulty whatsoever.
Why does philosophy constantly twist things into an over complicated mythical mess, and then act like it’s some novel insight?
I cannot stand that either, but this sort of pseudo-profundity is more common in some specific schools of thought, rather than philosophy in general.
Does a tree falling in the woods with nothing to hear it make a sound?
It's probably № 1 on my list of stupidest questions. The answer is yes.
And GPL compatible, so a fork of tmux
could be GPL-licensed on top of the ISC license.
*excited turtle noises *
Unfortunately, this is the first thing that came to mind.
use the app center
That’s a weird thing to call a package manager.
When was this?
Journalism was always like this when it comes to reporting on research.
bad for your teeth