![](/static/23fb711/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
Threat of impeachment. Dems will vote for impeachment. Republicans will, too, if the president is a Democrat.
Threat of impeachment. Dems will vote for impeachment. Republicans will, too, if the president is a Democrat.
Obama broke Occupy. Biden and Clinton are vocal about not supporting the anti-genocide protests (except to say the protestor have specific rights).
There are no political leaders sympathetic to protests here. Only those who could maybe be cowed if we really fought. If that was likely, the FBI would infiltrate and agitators would create reasons for enforcement.
We’re talking Floyd levels of riot that would remind people of Jan 6th and leave people feeling justified. MLKs proymtests were NOT popular at the time… We’re looking for something and someone like that. Closest we’ve got is Shawn Fain.
My riot, for now, is my vote and my tepid support of formerly-Dark Brandon. He’s done a lot. More than most. But Garland was a shit pick. And now we’re here with trials delayed all over the place because Garland dithered.
We* should be free to own as many guns as we want.
*You know.
“When you’re a star…”
Thank you for saying this. This fact is missed so often and it’s vitally important to understand US politics right now.
He has to be part of an opinion in order for this to work. That opinion stands the test of time best if he can put forth a legal opinion that supports his preferred answer.
“Congress shall”… I wonder if that’s part of his thinking.
legally carry a gun
Watch states try to find ways to allow him within their borders.
So does coffee, really (imo). Until the taste is acquired.
Then it’s habit forming.
Republicans honor sacrifice by making sure it’s big. They’ll send you to war and complain about VA costs.
Law and order never meant what many heard.
Law and order keeps people in their place. It’s an argument for an old status quo.
It never meant following or enforcing the laws. It’s privilege saying it doesn’t want to budge.
That, unfortunately, is up to voters and fate (health, decline, etc).
We can have a justice system that dies that too, but we’d have to vote that and it would need to poll over 75% without hypocrisy.
It’s the 4 mil we found.
I’m with you on this.
I also expect Putin to not miss any opportunity to destabilize the US. This seems like another vector and he can do it with any kind of votes.
The SCOTUS is consistently demonstrating that they are political actors and illegitimate as jurists.
We should pack the court with ethical peoe until the corruption is under 10%. If that means 20 jurists… So be it.
I’ve had enough and now stare decisis can’t be defended. Not when corruption is making decisions AND overriding previous well decided decisions.
It’s what I’ve expected for years… A wall?
Just not based on racial animus… based on protecting the ability of citizens to not become overwhelmed with displaced people.
Climate displacement is coming. What’s the policy when it does?
Have we thought through how that would work?
You need a better hobby.
We’re working on it. I try to vote as left as I can (effectively) on any ballot in front of me. Primaries and general.
If we all did this, with high turnout… We’re getting the government we vote for.
Replace the mature trees at any cost. If those don’t “take” do it again.
And again. And again. Until the soil accepts the fully mature trees.
Onve they’ve lost millions, I hope they’ll serve as a proper cautionary tale.