Oh yeah, forgot about that…
Oh yeah, forgot about that…
To the country that elected Trump he actually might be.
Keep it on non-dangerous topics and I’m with ya lol
You can get alarms that you place under the mattress and they shake the entire bed
I dunno, why don’t you ask, eg: Russia?
Because by law in certain countries, homosexuality is persona non grata, and a filter needs to be there to legally operate in such countries.
It’s a bit more complicated than simply taking the worst experiences someone has ever had.
Every experience, every story from friends, every story in the news, heck even portrayals in fiction, contribute to someone’s perception of an event, object, person or even group.
Now place yourself in the position of your average woman. You hear rape stories on the news, probably known a few people that have been SA’d if it hasn’t happened to you personally, and you’ve almost certainly had a few close calls at least. Are you telling me you wouldn’t have your guard up?
Which is why the important lesson from the bear meme is that a whole lot of women are incredibly stupid.
Woah woah woah, hold the fuck on for two fucking seconds.
First of all, as I said before, this shit goes both ways. Men do this too.
Secondly, I did NOT say that using our perceptions is a bad way to make decisions. Multiple experienced incidents and multiple stories can create a perception of danger, and that perception may be wrong at times, but it can also be dead on at critical moments. It is a survival tactic that serves people well in general.
You’re using the bear analogy wrong. If the bear analogy was about statistics, they’d choose the human because statistically speaking, many, many more people are helpful than harmful. Especially compared to a dangerous wild animal.
People pick the bear because they themselves have been hurt too many times or have heard of people being hurt too many times. There is a perception that the bear is safer.
That can go both ways. And often people choosing the bear can be in a vulnerable state, which the likes of Andrew Tate preys on.
Choosing the bear is how one starts on either path. Then they get manipulated by hate spreaders and fraudsters.
This company wasn’t exactly targeted. It could have happened to literally anyone.
Many do. Why is why we have MGTOW and Andrew Tate
Indeed. I’d say the on-site guys really need training. Beyond working directly on the master image and writing to it or reporting false findings, there isn’t as much that can be irrevocably fucked up in the analytics room.
Acquisition is a whole different story. One seemingly small fuck up and the evidence is toast.
On-scene stuff is a bit different. You’re not doing the actual analytics on scene if you can help it, you’re obtaining the evidence. Of course that still needs specialist training, you can’t simply copy and paste shit, but it’s very different to what goes on in the forensic lab.
They aren’t given to patrolmen. They have dedicated and specially trained units. Otherwise the evidence can be nullified.
Source: have worked in digital forensics.
Some PDs do have their own digital forensics units. It isn’t a task handed to patrolmen
They believe Tories don’t go far enough.
Yep! Such container breakouts exist even today in Citrix !
Shit like this was what got me into cybersecurity
PS2 released in 2000. By 2002, Dreamcast already went under and Xbox and GameCube were about to release.