• ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    edit: it is worth noting that having root access on a desktop Linux system is horribly insecure as well, though. I completely remove sudo on my systems (although considering one can just invoke su -c or su - root that doesn't help too much in actuality)

    You have just proven you never or very rarely use a computer. How do you even update the system without sudo or an alternative to it?
    Without root permissions you basically can't manage your system anymore.

    • zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      one of the reasons I use nix package manager is because it doesn't require root. it has separate build users and a daemon responsible for privileged file management. I also have a separate user with access if I absolutely need it, or I can log in with a live session and chroot into my system.

      if you need root for a general purpose application then it's badly designed

    • zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      a better solution than giving blanket root access would be an API/daemon that provides more fine grained permission control, similar to how flatseal manages the flatpak sandbox.

      edit: anyone wanna help me on a new project idea…?

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      su - is actually the traditional way of getting superuser permissions on a Linux device—enter your root password, and it gives you a root shell that can perform all administration tasks. I've never even had sudo installed on my systems, because it doesn't improve security for my specific use case. (How relevant is this to the various Android-device-related points? Not at all, really.)