• Dr Cog@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The argument is less that an LLM is a human and more that it is not a copyright violation to use a material to train the LLM. By current legal definitions, it is fair use unless the material is able to be reproduced in its entirety (or at least, in some meaningful way).

    • ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      By current legal definitions

      Yeah, definitions that were written before this technology existed. I don't base my opinions on what is legal, legality nothing more than rules determined by those in power.

      Instead, I base them on what is ethical, and the consumption of material by LLMs and other AIs without the express permission of its creator is unethical.