• snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      ChatGPT cam bullshit about anything, but odds are anything complex will be wrong.

      Even simple things are probably wrong.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        I would not even trust it to summarize nuanced details in a lengthy article, let alone something science related (especially about new discoveries).

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      What value is a summary when you fully acknowledge that you can not trust it for accuracy?

        • Windex007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          People who are experts in the subject.

          Propegandists thrive by trying to convince people that they can’t trust anyone, because it makes foolish people believe that every voice carries equal merit.

        • 7toed@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          How many Rs are in orange

          There are no Rs in orange

          Yeah I’ll be using chatGPT for education, what could go wrong