• owf@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thing is, Google is also (still) just better.

    I use DDG as my primary search engine, but I find myself repeating searches with Google so often, I wrote a userscript to add a "Search with Google" link to the top of the DDG search results.

    • octochamp@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I've seen a lot of chat recently about Google search quality tanking and it's made me realise that I haven't re-searched a DDG query in Google for a really, really long time. when I first started using DDG as my main a few years back, I would repeat searches in Google probably 25% of the time? but I honestly can't remember the last time I had to now. Been at least 6 months!

      • WuTang @lemmy.ninja
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        unfortunately, I do that often. Even when using meta search engine which sources to google, Google UX and results are simply better but sometime feeling is just not rationale

        regarding duckduckgo, it is simply too long to type and people rarely configure their browser, especially on mobile.

        so yeah, in a sense, Weinberg is right. At the very least, a choice should be provided on first run but you can't force people to be curious.

      • RustedSwitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but I think there’s still benefit to what the other person did. Search DDG by default, and then if you don’t see good results, it’s one extra click for the google search… vs mousing, clicking, 2 keystrokes…

    • BurnedDonutHole@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree. At least in my experience Google does a better job when it comes to search engine. I use DDG as well but when it comes to searching specific things Google beats it unfortunately.