Tech company faces negligence lawsuit after Philip Paxson died from driving off a North Carolina bridge destroyed years ago

Discuss!

  • Kalash@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So sue the county or who ever is in charge of erecting the barriers. Still not the map's fault.

    • stopthatgirl7@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The bridge broke down years ago. Google is absolutely also at fault for sending someone down it, along with whoever didn’t have warnings up. Multiple entities can be at fault here.

      • coffinwood@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There has never been a guarantee for a map to be absolutely precise and correct. Just because maps today are digital and get updated automatically - or are even something like "live" - does not mean that there can't be any inaccuracies.

        And that's the reason one never relies on a map alone, but uses it as a guide.

        I've seen road signs that were simply wrong. Always use a combination of informational input and always be aware of possible flaws.

      • Neve8028@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Given that there weren't any signs or barriers, it sounds like the local authorities are the ones at fault here. It could even be that that didn't file the proper paperwork to indicate that it collapsed. Google gets it's information from some database and if their sources aren't accurately reporting data as they should, google wouldn't have any way of knowing that the bridge collapsed. Ultimately, hazards like this should be clearly blocked off. Google doesn't have the power to do that.