German energy giant RWE has begun dismantling a wind farm to make way for a further expansion of an open-pit lignite coal mine in the western region of North Rhine Westphalia.

I thought renewables were cheaper than coal. How is this possible?

  • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Have you any pictures of Azov with swastika, black sun, or such since 2014?

    The Black Sun and Wolfsangel have been right on their fucking shit rag of a flag until last year, you fascist turd.

    JFC the entire first page of your comments is nothing but nazi apologia, fick dich du kranke Faschosau.

    • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hey rember when they just got those new leopard tanks and some rascal painted a bunch of iron crosses on them, which libs insisted was from obscure world War 1 battalion and not where literally everybody knows the iron cross from, to the point the German government said they weren’t gonna keep giving them weapons if that shit didn’t stop

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The black sun got removed in 2015, this is the new one. But, go on, spin random bullshit.

      JFC the entire first page of your comments is nothing but nazi apologia

      Yeah I happen to be arguing with another fascism-trivialising hexbear idiot in another thread.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Panzergrenadierbattalion 13 of the Bundeswehr (1980-1992, dissolved because cold war over). You’ll find it in more insignia not to mention coat of arms of towns but that one is closest to Azov in the sense that it’s simply a singular Wolfsangel. At least among the ones I could find within 10 seconds of googling.

          The Wolfsangel is not a Nazi symbol as such. If you want to outlaw everything the Nazis ever used then nothing would be left, including the Antifa flags because they totally did try to appropriate those. They’re getting off on that shit and you seem to be willing to play right into their hands.

          • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s a neo-Nazi symbol because neo-Nazis like to use it.

            https://www.adl.org/resources/hate-symbol/wolfsangel

            Arguing “well actshually they used a bunch of different symbols” is more Nazi apologia since very few symbols were used as widely by the Nazis as the swastika or the wolfsangel. There’s a reason you don’t see neo-Nazis tattooing antifa flags on their bodies.

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              In the US, that might be true. Germany doesn’t recognise it as such (page 82, “only illegal in connection with outlawed organisations, otherwise legal”), and neither does Ukraine. Context matters.

              You can consider it more akin to the Iron Cross, just less common, which the ADL has a much better take on: “[…] an Iron Cross in isolation (i.e., without a superimposed swastika or without other accompanying hate symbols) cannot be determined to be a hate symbol. Care must therefore be used to correctly interpret this symbol in whatever context in which it may be found.”

              • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                So they change their flag from one symbol widely used by Nazis to another symbol widely used by Nazis, but somehow that doesn’t make them Nazis.

                Care must therefore be used to correctly interpret this symbol in whatever context in which it may be found

                The context is it’s a widely-known Nazi symbol on a flag for a battalion whose members frequently express neo-Nazi views. What other fucking context do you need?

                • barsoap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  No the interior ministry kept the non-Nazi part of their emblem. They also kept the name, which also isn’t Nazi but the name of the Azov Sea (east of Crimea, north of the Kerch straight). When Azov got integrated into state structure tons of Nazis left because they didn’t want to be under state control and be told what they could and couldn’t do politically etc, some stayed but the state imposed strict “don’t do Nazi things” controls. In the beginning (2016 or such) it was about 20% Nazis left over so even back then a minority, there’s been churn and growth since then so it should be quite a bit lower by now.

                  The old pre-national guard Azov was definitely a Nazi cesspool, yes, and alas one of the very few capable fighting forces at the start of the Russian invasion (for the record, that’s 2014). Then regular people joined because they also wanted to fight and could look past the iffiness, that’s why Azov already hadn’t been purely Nazi at the time the Ukrainian state integrated and denazified them.

                  But all that nuance is lost in both Russian propaganda and also western media, where some libs found themselves a juicy topic to sell clicks with.