• Geek_King@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nope, but serving in the IDF, and having some vocal opinions on the campus protests in favor of Palestine is just the thing Harris doesn’t need to be saddled with.

        • ccunning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          Pennsylvania Governor and potential Democratic vice presidential nominee Josh Shapiro on Friday sought to distance himself from a recently uncovered op-ed he wrote in college, in which he identified as a former volunteer in the IDF and argued that the Palestinians are too “battle-minded” to pursue peace with Israel.

          “While he was in high school, Josh Shapiro was required to do a service project, which he and several classmates completed through a program that took them to a kibbutz in Israel where he worked on a farm and at a fishery,” Shapiro’s spokesperson Manuel Bonder told The Times of Israel.

          “The program also included volunteering on service projects on an Israeli army base. At no time was he engaged in any military activities,” Bonder added in a statement responding to an inquiry regarding the nature of his volunteer work.

          Sounds like he was trying to talk himself up in the article he wrote right out of high school. Definitely seems he worked on an IDF base but probably not for the IDF.

          Either way, probably good he wasn’t the pick. The opposition wouldn’t be concerned with such nuances.

          • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, the facts and his actual current opinions matter much less than optics. Still, he has further vulnerabilities too besides Israel so I’m very positively surprised by the Walz pick. Dems seem to be on the ball and have their finger on the pulse of America for once.

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      3 months ago

      Walz is a low risk, medium reward pick. Shapiro is reverse. Can’t win the Presidency without Pennsylvania. I think the jabber that the far left came up with regarding Shapiro is shameful and embarrassing, but the choice is made and it’s time to move forward.

      • Kingofthezyx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Wouldn’t the opposite of a low risk, medium reward pick a high risk, medium reward pick?

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Shapiro was high risk and high reward. Now that the decision has been made, I hope you can cheer for the Philly ward ladies to deliver Pennsylvania.

      • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think Shapiro guarantees PA. His approval is good, but it’s not crazy high like Beshear. And his vulnerabilities make him too risky of a pick, you don’t want to halt the positive momentum and alienate the young voters you have finally gotten energised.

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          Not that it matters, but the political tactics in Pennsylvania are a bit different. Shapiro’s popularity in rural communities would be quite beneficial.

      • P00ptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think you’ll be surprised by the number of surprise states going blue for this election. A lot has happened since 2020 on Trump’s side, and none of it has been good.

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yeah, but you celebrate the genocide. I know you post a lot so the arguments between us from months ago will be far back in the history, but there is nothing surprising about someone who justifies genocide siding with the candidate who served in the military that is currently committing genocide.

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m not siding with any candidate. I don’t care who the democratic VP candidate is. Try again.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            I don’t need to try again, but when you post seemingly innocuous opinions that tangentially touch on your support for genocide without referencing it, and I see it, I will post so that others will know that they are interacting with something posted by someone that supports genocide.