Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

  • froztbyte@awful.systemsOPEnglish
    12·
    3 months ago

    person who can barely brain themselves finds they have to engage with US postal system, hilarity ensues

    (via friend who often sends me tweet-screenshots (one day I’ll convince 'em to join here))

    • Soyweiser@awful.systemsEnglish
      11·
      3 months ago

      For those who are wondering, real tweet. I checked. Guy is defending himself by going ‘physical mail is outdated and shouldn’t exist’. This guy is going to get cybercrimed by somebody so hard.

      E: also interesting, and relevant to our interests, you can just buy prestamped envelopes, so thanks chatgpt.

    • gerikson@awful.systemsEnglish
      4·
      3 months ago

      Dude got a check delivered to him, presumably via the same mail system he is shitting on? But fine, apparently “not getting paid” is also a competitive advantage.

      Also checks, lol???

      • froztbyte@awful.systemsOPEnglish
        5·
        3 months ago

        Also checks, lol???

        the US (banking system, but not exclusively that) is living in the past to a stunning degree

        couple years back when I visited (mid 2010s), in DC I had someone make a physical imprint of my CC for a payment, and in NYC doing card transactions on the subway ticket machines it doesn’t ask for card pin but instead for zip code (and as a non-resident, you just enter 0000 (never tried to see if others work))

        checks/cheques are still a rather frequent way of inter-business/inter-person value transfer

        • gerikson@awful.systemsEnglish
          4·
          3 months ago

          We usually trail a bit behind here in Sweden so none of the plastic cards in my wallet have raised numerals anymore, but the last generation I had did.

          I’m old enough to literally handling cashing checks as a bank teller. Nowadays I guess a cashiers check is still in demand for big ticket items like vehicles but last time I got a car (via credit) it was all done by my digitally signing a bunch of stuff on my phone.

          • froztbyte@awful.systemsOPEnglish
            3·
            3 months ago

            yeah here in ZA we’ve had futuristic banking since the 00s (straight-up USSD banking services were available), chip&pin have been around for probably a decade if not more

            it did take a little while for NFC to roll out (probably because our banks are dicks and charge vendors for payment terminals, which many would bother not replacing while their existing ones work) but even that is well into “you can nfc-pay at shops in towns in the middle of nowhere”

            afaik US banks are still working on the really, really hard problem of … same-/next-day interbank payments. you know, that thing that most other places have figured out 2~3 decades ago? yeah

            • gerikson@awful.systemsEnglish
              3·
              3 months ago

              tbf I believe a contributing factor for US banks being stuck in the 1950s is regulation designed to prevent giant mergers. But I may be wrong.