- cross-posted to:
- techtakes@awful.systems
- cross-posted to:
- techtakes@awful.systems
Faced with new legislation, Iowa’s Mason City Community School District asked ChatGPT if certain books ‘contain a description or depiction of a sex act.’
I’ll never understand this. Do they seriously not think teens don’t know about sex without reading it in a book?
I suspect that it’s basically instinctual.
Like, if they some how manage to keep 2 kids from ever seeing members of the opposite sex from ever meeting, nevermind learning about sex until their wedding day… they’re going to be fucking the moment they’re alone together.
Maybe even before that.
It’ll probably be the worst sex ever, but it’ll still be enough to get young women/girls preggo - and really what they want. That and to ruin lives.
‘As an AI language model I cannot provide a unifying definition of both the words dystopian and ironic.’
…oh…. This is going to end well
It’s backwards policy they need to follow. But, if you’re going to follow a backwards policy, might as well do it as efficiently as possible.
Are there any ongoing legal challenges against these book bans that anyone knows of?
That’s not what LLMs are for. It won’t work.