“We will see if this is a legal and valid election,” Stefanik, a member of House GOP leadership and a Donald Trump ally, said in an interview with “Meet the Press.”

“We will see if this is a legal and valid election,” Stefanik, a member of House GOP leadership and a Donald Trump ally, said in an interview with “Meet the Press.”

Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., on Sunday wouldn’t commit to certifying the 2024 election results during an interview on NBC News’ “Meet the Press.”

While interviewing Stefanik, who serves in House Republican leadership, host Kristen Welker asked, “Would you vote to certify, and will you vote to certify, the results of the 2024 election no matter what they show?”

Stefanik, who has boosted former President Donald Trump’s baseless claims of widespread fraud in the 2020 election, said that she did not vote to certify the 2020 results in the state of Pennsylvania and several other states because there were “unconstitutional acts circumventing the state legislature and unilaterally changing election law.”

  • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
    15·
    9 months ago

    Uh huh.

    And, Great Minds, why would anyone say yes unequivocally before an election that hasn’t happened and might have actual fraud in it?

    • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
      41·
      9 months ago

      Dur, are you that dumb or what ? Even If you don’t like the results, you have to accept them. That is the whole issue about it.

      It is not a matter of a toddler wanting another toy, it is a politician. I know that you and that idiot also have the mental capacity of a toddler but without restrictions. Even if you don’t like the result you have to accept it.

        • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
          31·
          9 months ago

          Why, did your mirror broke?

          Still that you do not understand something so easy is really showing how much of an idiot you are.

          Even if that person doesn’t like the result, or thr maga moronic cult, they have to accept the result, like it or not.

              • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
                11·
                9 months ago

                Actually, I’m an anarchosyndicalist, and it wasn’t an attempt to refute anything.

                It was just a brief statement mocking someone I knew wouldn’t understand it, because they’re a circle jerking liberal with a brain the size of a peanut and the situational comprehension to match.

                • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
                  11·
                  9 months ago

                  Nah, more like a conservative idiot.

                  Sure you couldn’t refute a thing, you lack the capacity to give an actual good argument.

                  Lol, said by an idiot who has the reading comprehension of a toddler hahahahaj the irony.

                  But again, only an idiot would think that one person can just skip their functions of their job, just because they didn’t like the results. That is how stupid you are.