Pretty soon, paying for all the APIs you need to make sure your Midjourney images are palatable will be enough to pay a human artist!

  • self@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    it goes without saying that none of the hackermen point out that if it were as simple as applying a CV model to the generated output, the company generating the output would already be doing it (and I’ve given up on the idea that a hacker news poster could begin to analyze why that is). however:

    A meta question for y’all if you’re willing to share. I’ve seen y’all launch what I think is now 5 different ideas under the same name? I want to say that I remember a platform for musicians, and a platform to automatically convert a codebase into hostable inference servers, among a few other things.

    this feels like a con to me, or at least an indicator that these folks have no idea what they want to do. a post with that kind of tone would most likely get flagged dead by the mods, though, so the orange site remains a target-rich environment if you’re looking for folk who might invest in your scam/bad idea

    • 200fifty@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      there actually is a comment making this point now:

      Isn’t this product kind of impossible? Like a compression program that compresses compressed files? If you have an algorithm for determining whether a generated image is good or bad couldn’t the same logic be incorporated into the network so that it doesn’t generate bad images?

      the reply is a work of art:

      We’re optimistic about using our own algorithms and models to evaluate another model. In theoretical computer science, it is easier to verify a correct solution than to generate a correct solution (P vs NP problem).

      it’s not even wrong, as they say

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        In theoretical computer science, it is easier to verify a correct solution than to generate a correct solution (P vs NP problem).

        wh-what? I — there’s just so much wrong. is this the maximum information density of wrongness? the shortest string that encodes the most incorrect information? have these absolute motherfuckers just invented and then solved inverse Kolmogorov complexity?