Summary:

Democrats are becoming increasingly concerned about a possible drop in Black voter turnout for the 2024 presidential election, according to party insiders. The worries arise from a 10% decrease in Black voter turnout in the 2022 midterms compared to 2018, a more substantial decline than any other racial or ethnic group, as per a Washington Post analysis. The decline was particularly significant among younger and male Black voters in crucial states like Georgia, where Democrats aim to mobilize Black voter support for President Biden in 2024.

The Democratic party has acknowledged the need to bolster their outreach efforts to this demographic. W. Mondale Robinson, founder of the Black Male Voter Project, highlighted the need for Democrats to refocus their attention on Black male voters, who have shown lower levels of engagement. In response, Biden’s team has pledged to communicate more effectively about the benefits that the Black community has reaped under Biden’s administration, according to Cedric L. Richmond, a senior advisor at the Democratic National Committee.

However, Black voter advocates have identified deep-seated issues affecting Black voter turnout. Many Black men reportedly feel detached from the political process and uninspired by both parties’ policies. Terrance Woodbury, CEO of HIT Strategies, a polling firm, suggests that the Democratic party’s focus on countering Trump and Republican extremism doesn’t motivate younger Black men as much as arguments focused on policy benefits. Concerns are growing within the party that if they fail to address these issues, disenchanted Black voters might either abstain or, potentially, be swayed by Republican messaging on certain key issues.

  • icdmize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m 40+, but youngsters are probably thinking, ‘Vote for old white guy #1 or old white guy #2, who cares, neither can relate.’ I voted for Joe last time only because Bernie wasn’t running. I’m thinking Marianne Williamson this time, though. I don’t know if Joe will make it, and I definitely don’t want Kamala as president. She put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana.

    • Chunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      'Vote for old white guy #1 or old white guy #2, who cares, neither can relate.

      Anyone who actually thinks this way is so far off base it’s unbelievable. Politics isn’t a personality contest. It’s ruthless, calculated pragmatism.

      I’m thinking Marianne Williamson this time, though. I don’t know if Joe will make it, and I definitely don’t want Kamala as president. She put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana.

      This is an incredibly privileged and out of touch opinion. The damage that Republican policies will inflict on this country is egregious and you’re going to base your vote on the fact that Kamala put people in jail for weed? This isn’t a game. This isn’t a happy democracy where we show up and vote for our feelings. This is literally a calculated political exercise. Your attitude is dangerous and by NOT voting for harm-reducing policies you are contributing to a worse America.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        you don’t seem to know what harm reduction means. it’s not voting for the architect of the crime bill.

        • Chunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the alternative is worse then yes, it’s voting for the architect of the crime bill. It’s not ideal but it’s still harm reduction.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            harm reduction is accepting that the thing is going to happen (some shitty politician is going to win) and trying to mitigate that harm.

            ie harm reduction in regards to iv drug use is providing safe needles, injection sites, and testing kits.

            dont try to conflate sucking bidens dick with reducing the harm from the government.

            • Chunk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Harm reduction is reducing harm. Pretty straight forward.

              If Politician A wants to pass harmful drug laws and Politician B wants to do even worse, then voting for Politician A is harm reduction.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                that is not what harm reduction is and you should stop spreading misinformation along with your bad advice and politics.

    • Narwhalrus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just curious, if Marianne doesn’t get the Democratic nomination do you still plan on voting for the Democratic nominee?

      Regardless of your feelings about Harris, (I have similar feelings) you must recognize that having her as president would be, by far, the lesser evil when compared to Trump especially if you’re concerned about excessive imprisonment / decriminalization of marijuana.

      • icdmize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll be voting for Joe if Marianne doesn’t get the nomination. Trump is a conman and a criminal in my eyes. Joe is a corporate Democrat and I would much rather have a a social Democrat. I’ll take what I can get though.

    • Subverb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree with you in principle, but please hold your nose and vote for Joe like I will be doing. Splitting the vote is how we’ll end up with a second Trump presidency.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s less about the race and age of the person and more about the politics. Bernie was “old white guy” but he excited young voters. They couldn’t overcome the behemoth party machine and their big media buddies working hard to redirect voters.

    • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Criminal justice is what got me political in the first place tbh. I can abide by your line on kamala. And I would love a female president.

      • Chunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Say, for the sake of the argument, there are only 2 viable candidates. Guy #1 wants to kill 1 million people and Guy #2 wants to kill 2 million people who do you vote for?

        You vote for Guy #1. You flyer, donate, and campaign for Guy #1. If you vote for some 3rd party who can never win you aren’t being brave or informed, you’re literally doing nothing while Guy #2 tries to kill 2 million people.

        We don’t live in a happy, beautiful world where we have the privilege of picking the policies we want to enact. We have 2 choices and they are “bad” and “worse”. This isn’t about your feelings. This is about the actual impact that bad policy will have on millions and millions of Americans.

  • infyrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    Democrats have until next March/April to get some more refined, relatable and more prominent candidates to front run it’s party. Right now, we aren’t hearing about any of them as much except Biden re-election. That is not a very strong position, I feel, to be leaning towards. The guy could still fall over dead at any point and he could be tired from running again next year.

    I don’t want us to be left with just Biden as the “choice” to vote for. I only voted Biden to get us out of the nightmare circus a few years ago. I don’t have the ambition to vote for him again on his prowess alone, because there’s things with the guy I simply don’t like. Notably, with him being in bed with the entertainment industry and their efforts to demonize piracy. When, he isn’t nailing them down for corruptible practices against the consumer.

    What happened in 2016 when we were left with Clinton and Trump? Welllll, we ended up with fat orange old dude because we didn’t want the corporately approved democrat in Clinton to make it. Sanders was too good, I suppose.

    We’ll get these results again, might not be specifically Trump again, but whoever Republicans will position. Hope not DeSantis of all fucking people.

    • Don Corleone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not a Biden superfan either but I think people need to be aware of the reality. I have kids that don’t feel like voting because “Biden does not excite them”. While he doesn’t excite me either, it’s important to understand that not voting for Biden is essentially a step in the direction of the “other guy”, which happens to me MUCH MUCH WORSE than Biden.

      It’s naive to think that you can go from a to z without going through b, c, d, etc… We don’t vote for the ideal candidate, we vote for one that at least seems to be pointing in the right direction and has a chance to win.

      Also remember that this whole “both sides are the same shit, so why vote” idea was spread around exactly to discourage people from voting. It’s key to be mindful of that.

    • catshit_dogfart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll say I have a considerably higher opinion of him now than I did in 2020. Then, I basically voted for a seat-filler, hold down the fort so the fascists aren’t in power. Now, I’m fairly impressed.

      But the fact remains that the man is 80. Sometimes he looks like a canny old man, and I kind of like canny old men, those old guys who are sharp as a tack with a wit to match. And sometimes he just looks elderly. I don’t like the idea of the oldest president ever three times in a row. Frickin 80, he’ll be 86 by the end of a second term. That’s a problem. And while I don’t have any problems with Harris, a lot of folks do.

      My best hope is that he’s saying he’s running because it’s politically weak if he doesn’t. And if Trump is convicted of something before 2024, he’ll bow out and there will be a democratic primary. Worst case scenario, I won’t feel bad about voting for him again.

      Well maybe a little - the man deserves a comfortable retirement.

  • starrox@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    From a non-US standpoint this is rather easy:

    You have 2 geriatric options. Option 1 would lead to a dictatorship. Option 2 would lead to the - non-ideal - status quo.

    How the fuck do you even have to think about which option would be better???

    • TwoGems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. I live in America and I can’t believe the stupidity of some of these comments like “well because they’re running Joe Biden I won’t vote waaaah!” Ok, then enjoy your dictatorship? It culturally is the worst thing I hate about being here.

    • Thurgo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Dems have ran non ideal status quo candidates for so long it becomes fatiguing so people stay home or write in Snoop Dogg.

      • starrox@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I totally understand the frustration - apathy cannot be a solution in this scenario!

        You’d rather sit at home and watch your democracy go up in flames than just make an “x” on a piece of paper or a screen? Seriously, come on man…

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nothing in the comment to which you replied suggests that the commenter has given up. They merely describe what causes people to do so. At least as I read it.

        • vagrantprodigy@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Democracy is going up in flames either way, the question is whether we want it fast or slow. The only way to stop it is for the Dems to put up decent candidates who want to stop the slide, and thus far, they’ve declined to do so. So while yes, we should keep voting blue to slow the slide, we shouldn’t be stupid enough to believe that doing so is enough to stop it.

        • silentknyght@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t be an idiot. It’s been going on for so long, and the two party FPTP system is so broken, that this disgruntlement is justified. If neither party changes, and if voting for the less bad choice is construed as endorsement, them what other choice does a conscientious voter have?

          • tidy_frog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            You do understand that the choice you are essentially voting for, if you don’t vote, is a fundamentalist dictatorship that will tell you how to live your life, and imprison you if you don’t obey, while taking your freedoms and wealth anyway even if you do. Yes?

            Apathy is fine as long as both parties believe in running a democracy. The gop no longer does.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      But if you don’t consider Trump the absolute threat that he is, you just stay home. When I thought there was no way he’d win (2016) I didn’t vote for Hilary because I hate her. I voted for Biden because the threat had become real.

      Dems are correctly assessing that there are still people who see Trump as a clown show rather than a future dictator.

      • HaiZhung@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        An actual fascist dictatorship IS the real threat. What do you think trump will do if he wins?

        • TwoGems@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep. These “I just won’t vote” comments are naive.

          We have lost the Supreme Court to Republicans and they put in three hack judges. We have lost the House. We barely have a 50/50, and some paid off Dems like Tricia Cotham who was a GOP plant switched sides. Steve Bannon is running chaos agent RFK Jr. to try to screw up Dem votes. We cannot pass any bills, really. We are at risk of Trump or a Hitler clone like Desantis running. We are at high risk of fascism right now.

          The LAST thing we need right now is to whine about current candidate availability. We are not in a position to do so. To not vote, or even vote third party right now in our tenuous position is suicide. We can fix these things later. But not now. The goal right now is to get in enough Democrats to repair what Trump did. Then prevent it from happening again. And it takes time.

        • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          First of all, not voting is, by definition, not a vote for anyone or anything. Second, the right to vote always includes the right to not vote for any of the given choices.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              What does it say about the democratic party that they praise this system, uphold it, and use it as a cudgel to shame people into voting for them? Top democratic members, including biden, claim that we need a strong republican party. Why do we need a strong fascist party? To scare people into voting for the democrats who are republican-lites, of course.

              • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                They mean a strong opposition party without fascists. The Rs are led by an actual Nazi who has stated his desire to obliterate all who oppose him If that’s not enough to motivate you, it means you’re okay with it.

                • hark@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This just screams “I can fix him!” but for a political party. The republican party is a lost cause, even assuming your charitable interpretation of what they said, it’s an impossible task. That democrats insist that we must keep them strong means that they’re not only okay with fascism, they actively encourage it. It is the natural evolution of capitalism, after all, and democrats are all about that. While they’re enabling fascism, democrats think they have a monopoly on morality and that if you don’t vote for them then it’s your fault that fascism exists… which, again, they enable.

                  I’ve said this elsewhere, but I vote for democrats every single time, I’m just not stupid enough to think it’s going to make things better. That’s simply not the goal of democrats.

      • starrox@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was mostly referring to the (likely) candidates as options, but yes, sadly you are right. Doesnt help that by design it is more difficult to vote for certain groups than others. Still. If I had to take a day off and risk my job by doing so - It would be worth it to prevent a dictatorship!

    • AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I just don’t bother voting. We need a large majority of eligible voters, those who actually don’t believe in the system, to stop showing up. When the tide goes out, we can all see who’s swimming naked.

  • Captain Howdy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Then maybe get a better candidate? I’m pretty sure most sane Americans will vote for anyone not Trump. It’s not that hard, just use another candidate…

  • 𝙣𝙪𝙠𝙚@yah.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s pretty obvious who to vote for considering Republicans are actively attacking our country. Sorry, I don’t vote for terrorists.

  • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve experienced a infinitesimal fraction of the bullshit, and empathize with the disillusionment. The system is dying. Trump did his damage already. That and worse are inevitable. Money in politics. Money in all of it, i mean you have people being locked up in the name of corporate, and ecobomic interest ffs. I vote in all the elections especially local because that can help shift police behavior for the better of day to day people. I didn’t always vote. When trump first won I was listening on a broken wireless am radio in a shitty apt with no power or food in absolute wonder at the depravity of man and the meaning of it all for me… I didn’t vote that year. Fuck me right? I didn’t even know where the polls were. The people not voting are the ones pushing boundaries IMHO. What we are opposed to is the ruling class. The dnc bootlickers and fascists alike can get fucked.

    Wed need the second coming of Jesus to save this version of “democracy” ffs.

  • The dogspaw @midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There zero chance democrats dont show up if trumps on the ballot nobody is better at energizing the democrats base than trump

    • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Trump on the ballot was what got me to vote. I’ve never really been jazzed enough to vote for someone, but I was sure angry enough to vote against.

    • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was just talking to a family member, and I was saying that I hope that it is trump. If the Republicans could put together any other non-controversial opponent, that person would destroy Biden in an election. Of course, I was happy that trump was running against Hillary as I thought he was the only opponent she could probably beat, so my prognostication skills are pretty shitty.

      Too bad the DNC is such a corporate shithole that they are unable to back any strong progressives.

  • Drewsipher@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone who voted Barr-Romney-Johnson-Biden I’m gonna be in the booth pissed I’m voting for Biden again considering the libertarians fully lost the plot and Republicans went full fascist with trump

      • Drewsipher@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I voted for Romney because I didn’t like the Johnson wing of the party…. I felt it was a bit to far down the end of burn it all down. He reeled it back in a little bit then I remember a crowd booing him for stating drivers licenses aren’t bad or something and I knew it had gone full unhinged.

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    He was too old the first time, I’m surprised he made it this long. I was under the impression that their plan was to have biden die during his term so kamala became the first woman president.

    • Cranakis @lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      “… Their plan was to have Biden die…”

      Can you hear yourself? That’s f’ng crazy.

      • cristo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Esperanto
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I dont think theyre plan was to outright let him die during the presidency, but I did think they would bust out the 25th amendment at least a year ago to put Kamala in charge

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You think they didn’t consider the possibility when they chose a 78 year old to run for president? It was probably more likely than not. Now even more so.

        • dzire187@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The possibility is considered with every election. That’s why there are two names on the ticket.

        • Cranakis @lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Goddamn. ok. Double down on crazy then. Who exactly is “they” here, in your worldview, may I ask?

          • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Jesus dude, I’m not talking about some secret society world order bullshit.

            Literally the democratic party decides who can run for leader of their party, you think Joe Biden just randomly says he wants to run and everyone says sure? Otherwise he would have to run as an independent.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, Kamala is a pretty bad choice too due to her record as a district attorney. I still can’t believe the Democrats ran with her despite police reform being such a huge issue in 2020

      • Wakmrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol I can believe it, do you think the Democrats actually want to do anything about the police?

  • basequal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sorry to bring up Reddit, but being interested in US politics (I’m not from the US) I’m impressed with the level of discussion here.

    Almost every political reddit comment section I’ve encountered was a cesspool of such polarized left vs right opinions that anything more nuanced and centered was buried right away.

    • Limit@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like that’s the problem in almost any political debate among people in the US. Everything is so polarizing. It always seems like it’s a “you’re either with us or against us”. And you can’t even discuss something you’re unaware of without some know-it-all jackals jumping down your throat with political rage.

      • solstice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I try so incredibly hard to be even keeled and not jump down throats with political rage. But even the phrase you used there, “you’re either with us or against us” my first though was gee who’s fault is that. (Bush II leading up to the iraq invasion in 2003 if anyone doesn’t know. 20 years ago so officially history I guess.)

        No matter which angle I think about it I just can’t stand the gop.

    • Chunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you actually think that? Dude, you need to read more forums. This place is an echo chamber.

    • solstice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably all the bots that are designed to push your buttons, trigger that dopamine rush from being the right one and fuck that asshole bot, and drive engagement. Instant cesspool.

  • zowka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was told that Biden was the more electable candidate. If this was the case this shouldn’t be an issue right?

  • LongPigFlavor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Young black guy here (mid 20s), I’ll be voting for Biden. Recently changed my party affiliation from Independent to Democrat.

  • NewEnglandRedshirt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe… Maaaaaayyyyyyybeeeee the Democrats need to nominate someone who is actually worth getting excited about instead of just being not-Trump.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because if voters are excited, they may start voting in primaries…

      Every since Obama beat Clinton 15 years ago, party leaders seem more motivated to make sure their pick wins the primary than a Democrat winning the general.

      “Moderates” seem ineffictive because they’re not trying to just win, they’re trying to win by as little as possible. Like a corrupt pro athlete who’s not throwing the game, but trying to win by less than the spread.

      They know the reason most people vote for moderates like Biden, is if they don’t, someone like trump would win. It’s just the party leaders would rather trade back and forth than let Dems like FDR win every election for decades.

      • keegomatic@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ever since Obama beat Clinton 15 years ago

        Jesus I thought you were exaggerating and then I did the math

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you think that’s bad:

          Biden’s first presidential primary was 35 years ago…

          He was the expected front runner due mainly to his (at the time) exceptional public speaking but got caught plagiarizing speeches, lying about his grades in law school, and even people finding out he cheated while in law school by plagiarising papers.

          But everyone forgot about all that because he spent 8 years standing next to Obama. And the only reason he got that job was to make old white people less uncomfortable voting for a Black guy.

      • Upgrade2754@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a great way to put it. Both parties are funded by dark money interests, one drives us to the right and the other keeps us in place. This is described as the ratchet effect

        • Elderos@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          and millions are claiming the democrats are radicals, little do they know that the country was more progressive on certain fronts 50 years ago. So they have to resort to blaming gays and trans, because everything else about the current staye of the country is kinda right-wingy to begin with.

  • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    If people don’t vote for Biden they are voting for the end of the US and democracy around the globe.

    • LexiconDrexicon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Democracy is letting the people choose for themselves, so if the people don’t vote for him it’s democracy all the same.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except republicans actively seek to circumvent democracy whenever they’re in power.

        See Ohio’s Issue 1 and rampantly, illegally, gerrymandered districts