minnix@lemux.minnix.dev to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoDo you think banning end-to-end encryption is plausible? Think again.github.comexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1227arrow-down17
arrow-up1220arrow-down1external-linkDo you think banning end-to-end encryption is plausible? Think again.github.comminnix@lemux.minnix.dev to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squarephase@lemmy.8th.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoI find this article more complex than it should. For me the logic is more basic: You want to ban encryption? So no https so no banking online.
minus-squareChahk@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoThey don't want to outright ban encryption. They want to force communication providers to build in backdoors. And not tell you about them.
minus-squarephase@lemmy.8th.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoBanking regulation is going to freak out with this. Tracking this risk which has to be kept hidden can only be fun.
I find this article more complex than it should. For me the logic is more basic:
You want to ban encryption? So no https so no banking online.
They don't want to outright ban encryption. They want to force communication providers to build in backdoors. And not tell you about them.
Banking regulation is going to freak out with this. Tracking this risk which has to be kept hidden can only be fun.