• WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not really criticizing him. My criticism is the weird constitution worship used as non-argument that simply begs the question.

        • Sarmyth@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          There aren't any religious documents here, liar. You need to stop making shit up to suit your arguments. And before you say you "don't really care" again, you obviously do, because you won't stop making up excuses for breaking the laws which were established by those same people you pretend to care so much about.

          • WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They aren't. But people treat them like they are. I do care about people using constitutions as if they were moral documents. I'd be just as annoyed if someone used a constitution to defend something like freedom of press or freedom of speech. I don't care about what the particular issue is: its the citing constitutions like they prescribes perfect morals that I care about.

            • Sarmyth@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              You are projecting if you think people consider the constitution a moral prescription. It's literally the law laid out by the people. If you would be annoyed by people using it to defend the freedom of speech and the press, then we already kinda know where your morality lies:

              I'd be just as annoyed if someone used a constitution to defend something like freedom of press or freedom of speech.