Feinstein fell Tuesday. “All of her scans were clear and she returned home,” the senator’s office said, adding that her hospital visit lasted about two hours.

  • Gray@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t even think this is necessarily an age issue. You can get Alzheimer’s at 50 too. To me the issue is a shameful unwillingness from Democrats to acknowledge Feinstein’s inability to fulfill her duties. Pelosi straight up called people sexist for suggesting Feinstein should step down. It’s despicable. If I was in California, I’d be pretty fucking mad right now that my senator was being used as a tool to advance other people’s interests by preying on her dementia.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was mad that we re-elected that mummy in 2020, but her opponent turned out to be pretty crappy, too.

      • Gray@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, bullet dodged on that guy. It’s pretty shitty when the choices are a racist or someone with Alzheimer’s. Especially considering how large California is, I’m pretty sure they could have come up with better options.

        • ZombieTheZombieCat@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, it’s really fucked up to keep seeing comments from non-Californians blaming us for voting for her, as though we have any kind of real choice.

          Regardless, it’s yet another case of Americans blaming other Americans, as usual, instead of blaming a system that allows this shit to happen and doesn’t give us viable choices of candidates in the first place.

    • cassetti@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Feinstein isn’t the only problem here. In fact the 118th Congress average age is the third oldest since 1789 .

      I cannot understand why people continue voting for the same incumbent year after year. Not once have I voted for the a politician, then thought to myself in the next election “they listen to me and deserve my vote again”. I refuse to vote twice for any politician unless I actually believe they care about the average person and I’ll be honest that has never happened. Maybe I just grew up in the wrong era and didn’t get to appreciate these politicians when they were in their prime twenty years ago?

      I just don’t get it. Are we voting based on a popularity contest of names we recognize on the ballot with a D or R next to their name? How f*cking pathetic. Look across the asile, both ways - maybe there’s someone decent out there. Unlikely, but maybe they’re better than the current guy who’s been there for thirty years.

      Politicians like diapers should be changed often, and for the same reason.

    • ZombieTheZombieCat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, ageism is horrible and too common especially against women. But it’s really disingenuous to say there should be no age limit whatsoever, especially when it’s acceptable in every other industry. No one is “preying on her dementia” as some kind of distraction. They have a political advantage to having her stay in office, it’s really not that hard. The choices are bullshit, as usual, because it comes down to keeping her in office the rest of her life or open it up to some fascist conservative.

      Of course reasonable Californians are mad. But do you have time to organize and get the signatures for a special recall election? Not many people do.