I don't see refenece in this article or any others, but how did prosecutors get access to SBF's Signal messages?

Was it simply a court order that he unlock his phone (and agreed), or a codefendant who flipped to the prosecution and handed over the thread?

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    None of the screenshots had self destruct timers, so I'm not sure how they were using signal… kinda looks like signal desktop

    more of the screenshots arnt cropped, they do have disappearing message timers, but they are using signal desktop, which doesn't do local encryption. So those disappearing messages are still on disk floating around…

    (Signal desktop AFAIK has a terrible security posture, not secure at all)

    • essteeyou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Signal desktop doesn't even have a PIN to unlock it. IIRC the reason was that if someone is already on your machine then you're screwed.

      I just want it to stop someone like my son, who may have access to my computer legitimately, from seeing some of the NSFW messages me and my friends send each other.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just make a separate user acct for the kid. That way your stuff is separate and you can also implement parental controls if needed.

        • essteeyou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, we have separate profiles, but sometimes I just let him use some software on mine, like a game, or whatever, and then I go and do something else. The use-case is there, along with encrypted messages, but people say things like what you said because they don't personally have that use-case.

          I'd look at implementing it myself, but they wouldn't merge it, and I'm not going to maintain a fork indefinitely.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            For your use case, running a VM on your desktop should be sufficient. The VM could have disc encryption. So when you're letting somebody else use your terminal, they can't access your interesting messages.

            Hyper-V has this built in I believe, QEMU does it as well, UTM on Mac OS makes it pretty easy. But there's a thousand different ways to skin this cat

            • essteeyou@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Most sensible way in my opinion would be for the Signal app to have a PIN and encryption on desktop, just like it already does on the mobile apps.

    • ikiru@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is there a way to clear messages from the disk other than by deleting the Signal Desktop app itself or is that sufficient?

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not really. Once data is written to disk it's more or less there forever. At least from a risk perspective.

        If your disc is encrypted, you can change the disc encryption key, throw away the old key, then it doesn't matter that the data is there you no longer have the key so the date is lost.

        Most people use full disc encryption, and they're unlikely to want to throw away all of their data just for signal.

        Unless you're using a container to run signal, or a virtual machine, or qubes : with disc encryption, then anything signal writes to the hard disk is more or less there forever from a risk perspective.