He has something in common with the "real programmers" in this sub then, disregarding an article and even calling the author ignorant because the thumbnail has some …ascii art?
I'mma be honest, the thumbnail does fit the article pretty well…
Because they're both pretty wack.
It's just restating the same talking points that have been around for decades.
I was expecting something more original and technical because of the thumbnail.
Pretty disappointing.
He has something in common with the "real programmers" in this sub then, disregarding an article and even calling the author ignorant because the thumbnail has some …ascii art?
I'mma be honest, the thumbnail does fit the article pretty well…
Because they're both pretty wack. It's just restating the same talking points that have been around for decades. I was expecting something more original and technical because of the thumbnail.
Pretty disappointing.