• Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      But cool part would be if Hunters charge was deemed unconstitutional but Trump’s was upheld.

      • Alteon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        If Hunter is charged, then Trump should be as well. If Hunter is dropped, then Trump's should be as well.

        I thought there was supposed to be a Statute of Limitations issue on the Hunter case, but still…fairs fair.

        • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          43
          ·
          1 year ago

          As I understand it, Hunter didn't answer the question correctly on his gun purchase. Not checking the box on drug use. Though this is against the law, a district court's already deemed it unconstitutional.

          Trumps is a straight federal code violation.

        • thesprongler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          Different situations completely. Hunter did not accurately fill out a form. Trump is under federal indictment.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If Hunter is charged, then Trump should be as well. If Hunter is dropped, then Trump's should be as well.

          Thank Christ this isn't how our legal system works. These are two different cases, and they're not linked in any way.

    • TwoGems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No that's not how it works. You see, the milquetoast AG Garland has to look non-political by actually being political and not charging Trump, but only charging Hunter Biden.