• Lmaydev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s assuming they’re using one of the generic models like ChatGPT and not something custom they’ve created specifically to do this.

    Edit: they are in fact using their own as per the article

    • andscape@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m aware they’re not using a generic model, but that’s not much better. Current custom-made models still fuck up significantly more than humans, and in less predictable ways.

      Even if their custom model is slightly incorrect 1% of the time, that’s still a major problem in critical systems like those.

    • ImpossibleRubiksCube@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s good to see that they aren’t just piping through GPT-whatever, but in my experience, the vast majority of people who tout AI, even at large corporations, generally have zero idea how it works. I’m still not convinced that this is a good idea.

      • FinancesDrone98@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mostly use A.I. to translate. ChatGPT gets that done it gets it done pretty good, especially when you say “translate this mandarin text into English. I don’t care if it is somewhat inaccurate, just do it as best as you can.“