• Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    392 months ago

    The Debian maintainer is probably a volunteer. Can we not troll people who make Debian and Foss possible?

    • chameleon
      link
      fedilink
      262 months ago

      The KeePassXC people are also volunteers and dealing with the fallout of this decision.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 months ago

        True, but let them settle it without turning a few thousand people against one person.

          • lemmyvore
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 months ago

            If by issues you mean looking out for people’s privacy sure, someone has to.

            • @vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              02 months ago

              by issues I mean breaking existing users’ workflow, possibly literally locking them out (I personally use a yubikey with my keepass db, for example).

              There is a very simple solution he could have done: not rename the existing package. Just give his fork a new name. That’s it, everybody is happy.

              So yes, he is the one causing issues. Because the issue isn’t in the features he removed, but by breaking the users’expectation that the package they installed yesterday, is the same one they’re updating today.

    • @9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      21
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      To be fair, it looks like the debian maintainer started the unfriendly discourse by calling the work of other FOSS devs “crap”

      Everyone needs to chill out, otherwise we have another potential XZ social engineering attack

      It would be catastrophic for something like keepass to have a malicious maintainer take over

    • federalreverse-oldOP
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You have a point to some degree, yet I still think it is defensible to make this post. He majorly altered software

      • downstream
      • against user expectations
      • for somewhat spurious reasons
      • seemingly quite ad-hoc

      He then went on to defend that decision in a less-than-graceful way before announcing there will be a second, new package.

      But, to make it clear: I certainly don’t approve of hate directed toward him and I don’t have a personal issue with him.

    • NaN
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -52 months ago

      He is paid by Canonical.

      Explains some of the hubris.