Did you read it? It primarily sources US provided figures and even states the methods to implement their stated goal in the area is unclear. It also addresses how tensions have been eased between the two countries. What more are you looking for? Regardless, doesn’t journalism by default always have some bias involved?
Unclear? I feel like it’s pretty obvious 99% of the times they move people around to raise tensions and intimidate others. The 1% of the times to actually start a war
I’m sure this article has no bias of any kind.
Did you read it? It primarily sources US provided figures and even states the methods to implement their stated goal in the area is unclear. It also addresses how tensions have been eased between the two countries. What more are you looking for? Regardless, doesn’t journalism by default always have some bias involved?
Does it really need to push the idea that a new conflict is coming though? The US military moves people around with unclear (public) reasons often.
Unclear? I feel like it’s pretty obvious 99% of the times they move people around to raise tensions and intimidate others. The 1% of the times to actually start a war