• booty [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It is not unsafe.
    It is not 100% private. Admins can read your messages if they choose to investigate your messages.

    These points contradict one another.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
      link
      fedilink
      511 months ago

      How so? The message is safely delivered solely to the intended recipient, albeit in plain text (not private).

      If there’s anywhere that the commonly used email analogy fits, I think it would be here

          • @TrustingZebra@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            411 months ago

            Unless I run a Lemmy instance myself (which is possible), I have zero reason to trust an instance’s admins.

            Even if my instance’s admin happens to be the founder of privacyguides.org, that doesn’t mean he will never read any “private” messages (or be forced by someone else to hand them over).

          • booty [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            011 months ago

            What definition of safe are you using which makes a private messaging system without privacy safe? What would have to occur for it to become unsafe, if not being private does not make it unsafe in your eyes?

      • booty [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        If something claims to be unsafe and delivers, that doesn’t make it any more safe.

      • booty [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        They absolutely do. A private messaging system which is not private is the definition of unsafe. Especially in the context of a post on !privacy@lemmy.ml