• ChihuahuaOfDoom
    link
    fedilink
    English
    254 months ago

    If they don’t think it’s genocide they are choosing to turn a blind eye.

    • MxM111
      link
      fedilink
      -254 months ago

      I disagree. The situation is not simple and one sided. For example, I can easily say that if you are for immediate cease fire, then you are for Hamas staying in power. And Hamas does openly state that they would like to destroy all Jews in Israel and Israel itself, and in fact were showing how they would do it by recent events. Basically Hamas official policy is Jewish genocide. So, that makes you genocide supporter, right?

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        214 months ago

        I can easily say that if you are for immediate cease fire,

        “But did they CoNdEmN Hamas?!” has gotten quite worn out. The answer is… nobody except Hamas is for Hamas. Most people have condemned hamas. Most people are not for Hamas, and that argument only holds water with people that have already decided to support genocide.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        134 months ago

        Hamas’ official policy is to accept the 1967 borders and a two state solution. It seems like you have a problem separating reality from propaganda.

        • MxM111
          link
          fedilink
          -24 months ago

          Hamas continues reflecting legitimacy of Israel, it never recognized it. Read any encyclopedia entry on Hamas. Sure, they would like to get all the land according to 1967 agreement, but they do not promise to recognize Israel even then.

          • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I reject the legitimacy of Israel. It was built on terrorism, won a few wars, had a chance to create a stable solution and passed, and is now an Apartheid state at best.

            Not recognizing Israel doesn’t mean anything else. It’s the diplomatic version of pretending someone is invisible.

            • MxM111
              link
              fedilink
              -1
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              It denies right to exist. It is not “invisibility game”. It has direct goal to erase the state and people in it. Hamas actions directly confirm it. For years it attacked civilian population with the goal of eradicate it. They are openly stating this the same multiple times themselves. They are showing it in their murderous actions and you pretend that it is some kind of “invisibility game”? Just Google “Hamas statements about Israel right to exist”. They want to physically destroy it. Jezus!

              Edit: Also, your double standards appalling: you reject Israel legitimacy because 70years ago they used terrorism tactics to get rid of Brits. But you seems totaly OK with Hamas today.

              • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                14 months ago

                I have never said I was okay with terrorists. You can have those words back. And the charter means exactly what it says. We didn’t commit genocide when we denied Saddam’s Iraq or Hitler’s Germany an existence. And not recognizing a state has a known international meaning. No amount of word salad trying to conflate terrorist attacks with genocide can undo that.

                • MxM111
                  link
                  fedilink
                  04 months ago

                  The goal of Hamas, stated many times, is to destroy Israel. Hamas actions are terrorism. Hamas goal is genocide aimed against one specific group of people. Your example of WW2 is actually a good one. It was not a genocide despite of the fact that Allies bombed essentially to zero cities like Dresden. Allies goal was to remove Nazi from power. Israel goal is to remove Hamas from power. So, what’s the difference?

                  • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    14 months ago

                    The difference is Dresden was a one off war crime. We didn’t keep doing it to every urban area, we didn’t corral civilians, and we certainly didn’t deny them food aid.

                    Based on how dead set you are on them killing Israelis, are you sure it’s not just you wanting to kill Israelis?

          • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            54 months ago

            That “source” dives straight into debunked Israeli propaganda. From repeatedly claiming Hamas took control of Gaza by force to repeating the debunked claim about beheaded babies. Then it ignores anything written after the year 2000.

            It buries the fact that Hamas won election more than ten paragraphs down. As if to provide the author a defense of having mentioned it.

            They also completely neglect to mention Hamas won that election on a moderate platform and was immediately attacked by Israel, physically and politically, for doing so. When the result of a moderate, anti-corruption, party winning is an immediate de facto declaration of war, I don’t see how anyone can objectively claim Hamas as the oppressor.

            Now to the current situation. Israel should be dissolved. The commission of a genocide is beyond the rights of any state and is a clear sign they cannot be trusted partners in peace. The only right answer is a UN transition government to a representative democracy that gives everyone rights to vote and bars the military from acting inside the borders of the successor state.

              • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                24 months ago

                Israel is a country. Dissolving a country and putting a regional transition government in place is not a genocide.

                But I’m not surprised you’d try to associate it as such.

                • MxM111
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -14 months ago

                  Let’s not pretend that destroying Israel means just dissolving the state. Hamas quite clearly demonstrated this with recent attack aimed to brutally kill 1000+ of civilian Jews.

                  • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    14 months ago

                    Oh no. We’re going to mean it. Because the UN has done it before. Israel isn’t some special snowflake. The Jews who live there can learn to live with their neighbors under an objective and fair government.

                    The country is not the people.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        74 months ago

        Just gonna say: Hamas’s official policy is that a two-state solution would be enough as accomplishment of their goals. That aside, even if Hamas goes away someone worse will take their place. To steal a random quote from the internet: The next generation of Palestinian terrorists/freedom fighters will think and do things that will make ISIS look like peace-loving hippies.

      • @mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        44 months ago

        This is what happens when you give no accountability to an ENTIRE NATION. They devolve into a country of Donald Trumps.

        1. Hamas can’t empty out entire villages and cities and hand then it to foreigners over the last quarter of a century
        2. Hamas cannot kick millions of people out of the country
        3. They can’t powder entire cities with poison
        4. They cannot carpet bomb
        5. They don’t have powerful allies
        6. They once kidnapped people
        7. Israel has kidnapped more people than that
        8. Anything you attribute to Hamas, remember Israel as done it worse and on a greater scale
        9. If this math is not simple to you, seek medical attention

        The difference of threat levels of Hamas compared to Israelis is night and day.