• OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      So kinda "we already have a program for this" and kinda "it infringes on state sovereignty by letting local government review our decisions" but it closes on "it costs money" which seems like the main reason.

    • tintory@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      https://x.com/CACommonGround/status/1710751960381657179?s=20

      Common Ground have thoughts on that

      "The veto of #AB309 – revenue neutral cost rental social housing on public land which could be built starting next year – while we only commit to study the issue for another 2-3 years is an insult to the millions of housing cost-burdened residents of California."