• Optional
    link
    fedilink
    2624 days ago

    And as a woman she remains subservient to his wishes.

    Hey, it’s in the bible people! Which, as you know from very key recent court opinions, is the inerrant word of your creator, the lord g-d almighty.

    Also, this just in: fascist Christo-nationalism is here and if we don’t vote these fuckers out we may never see the end of it in our lifetimes.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    924 days ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    While the SouthBank Legal website says that Jesse Barrett “focuses on white-collar criminal defense, internal investigations, and complex commercial litigation,” it notes, in a recent addition, that he has “represented a prominent media company in a lawsuit alleging defamation.”

    It is set to issue rulings soon on a slate of controversial topics, such as abortion, guns, public corruption, and whether Donald Trump is entitled to immunity for life for acts he committed as president.

    Jesse Barrett’s work for Fox Corp. highlights one of ethics experts’ biggest complaints about the Supreme Court: Justices are not required to disclose their spouses’ clients, so the public has no way to track who is paying money directly to their families.

    The lack of disclosure surrounding spouses’ business dealings has been a repeated source of ethical concerns, particularly with Justice Clarence Thomas.

    However, federal court records show that Barrett is serving as Fox Corp.’s lead counsel in an ongoing defamation case.

    The defamation case was filed by Lavell Redmond, an Illinois man who was convicted of aggravated sexual assault as a minor and served 24 years in prison.


    The original article contains 724 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 75%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!