• Farid
    link
    fedilink
    1546 months ago

    That Firefox logo was simplified, but not oversimplified. Even with a very small icon size you can still tell it’s a fox that is (on?) fire. The Firefox Family logo is oversimplified, just being a swoosh, basically.

    • voxel
      link
      fedilink
      166 months ago

      well the family logo is supposed to be as simple as possible

    • @bleistift2@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -496 months ago

      I beg to differ. Until now I never noticed the fox in the logo. And even now that I know it’s there I have a hard time finding it. And I’m looking at a version of almost 1cm on my screen.

      • Farid
        link
        fedilink
        32
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Well, I suppose it makes sense that it doesn’t apply to everyone, but my guess is that the majority can still see the fox.
        Either way, the simplification of modern logos is a necessity, because they are used in small UI elements, often even appearing monochrome. At which point they still need to be recognizable. Whether they are simplified in a good or bad way, is subjective though.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky
      link
      fedilink
      English
      176 months ago

      The new logo looks sleek and nice, but I personally just really like more complex logos.

      • @fidodo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        56 months ago

        You might like them in isolation but icons need to exist in a lot of uis and contexts so having an overly detailed one will make it look weird when juxtaposed with what’s around it.

    • @fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      106 months ago

      I like it too, the old one was too detailed which makes it stand out too much. Icons need to work in a lot of contexts so simpler is almost always better.

      • @accideath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        56 months ago

        The old one was great – in the context of late 00s to early 2010s design philosophy. It fit right in with Apple‘s skeumorphic design language and Microsofts Aero design. The new one is the perfect answer to the modern, more minimalist design. (Although I’m glad we’re mostly out of the "flat“ design era of Windows Metro and similar UIs)

        • @fidodo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          That’s true, it fit in with the trends of the time. I guess part of my feeling is that I never actually liked skeumorphic design so I’ve been happy that flat caught on. There was a period where it did get too flat, but I like the middle ground we’re at now.

    • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      106 months ago

      I think most actually like it more, it’s just people are a lot more likely to come online and make posts if they dislike something.

    • @Ross_audio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      46 months ago

      I’d be happiest with the simple one in the old colours.

      Orange and blue look way better to me than light orange and purple.

    • @bi_tux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      personally I think it’s not bad, but I still haven’t gotten used yo it

      tbh it smh feels like they just changed it a month ago, idk when they actually changed it

  • Hugucinogens
    link
    fedilink
    796 months ago

    I used to not like the new Firefox logo when it first came out, but by now, I couldn’t do with the old one, it looks so much… And I bet if they changed it back, it would take me 2 months max to switch opinions right back.

    At some point I have to accept, I’m just an ape of habit.

    • @BlanK0@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      346 months ago

      Honestly, its considered a hot-take but I do like minimalistic logos cause they are easier to recognize. Also they tend to better fit with the rest of the UI and products.

      • @ImpossibilityBox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        626 months ago

        Counterpoint is the bullshit Google did with all their icons. Same exact colors with different shapes makes quick differentiation an actual challenge.

        • @0ops@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          116 months ago

          That’s gotta be an icon pack, given the black and the weird colors. Am I wrong? Did they change it since I last used the stock icons?

            • @0ops@lemm.ee
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              46 months ago

              Not disagreeing with you there. I wasn’t even much of an icon pack guy until they did the white circle thing. It looks so cheap

        • And then they introduced to android a new option that only showed the shape of the icon in two tones. Now they have no colour and are just odd shapes.

        • @Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          46 months ago

          I can’t tell you how often I’ve opened Google Drive when I meant to open the Gmail app or vice versa.
          I know they technically don’t look that much alike, but at a glance they’re way too similar. Just use a different color for each app please?

        • @BlanK0@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          36 months ago

          Although the icons are kinda not minimal with the amount of colors in there, they could have like made one app with one or two colors and the other with different ones

        • @poppy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          36 months ago

          Why does Drive not match the color tone of the rest of them? It’s so muted.

          • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            96 months ago

            Those icons absolutely do not look normal, there’s some kind of theme being applied to all of them, likely a dark mode before it became a standardised feature, by the looks of it.

      • @Kissaki@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        126 months ago

        It all depends on context. The Firefox logo is good and fine as a brand logo you can put on the product website, big enough, or the about dialog. But as an application icon I dislike it. I would prefer a simpler, more recognizable, flat-colored version.

    • @gaterush@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      16 months ago

      I generally agree. However, for the MDN Web docs icon, I’m not sure I’ll ever acclimate to that one, even with how often I see it. so bad. Love MDN still though

  • @Hubi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    756 months ago

    The new reddit logo is pretty awful but both Firefox logos are fine IMO. They are both pretty well done, just in different styles.

    • @CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      126 months ago

      Are they trying to fool investors that it’s a messaging service? The little tail on the bubble makes it look like a WhatsApp ripoff.

    • verysoft
      link
      fedilink
      116 months ago

      Yup, the design for Firefox’s logo is just a million times better than reddit’s, simplification arguments aside. FF just did a much better job.

  • @FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    496 months ago

    The new reddit one is so fucking weird to look at.

    It makes the snoo a little too human, I get uncanny valley vibes from it.

    The Firefox logo is great though. It’s not over simplification. It’s just keeping up with the times and doing a great job of it IMO.

  • kase
    link
    fedilink
    436 months ago

    I like both the firefoxes. They’re good boys!

    I also like the old alien. I’m not someone who generally gets upset when companies introduce a new logo, but the new alien is just nightmare fuel. Get away!!

  • cum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    406 months ago

    If they didn’t change the firefox logo, it’d definitely look extremely dated today though

      • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        Apostrophy for possessive is OK. Iirc, it’s just uncommon on “it’s” solely to differentiate between “it is”. I know for a fact this is what I was taught in college and still have the English book. Some teachers and books written by those teachers pretend there never was a hard rule for possessive apostrophies.

        For example, the AP styling guide says do not add an extra ‘s’ for singular possessive when the word already ends in s or z, but traditional English rules say do it.

        • @PopMyCop@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          46 months ago

          Yeah, it gets complicated when formal rules can just be made up. I had a group of professors who published a little sheet saying, “These are the ways we like it, but unless it’s truly horrendous, you aren’t getting knocked for it.” Their rule was something along the lines of pre-Roman fall, names that ended in -s don’t get an extra ‘s, but afterwards they do. So Jesus’, but Aquinas’s… /shrug

          • JackbyDev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            Let’s talk about the real issue, how do I make proper boundaries that are singular and possessive plural? Imagine a restauranted Pop’s. Is it Pop’ses?

  • @sgbrain7@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    326 months ago

    The Reddit one looks like if they made a mobile game that’s just another Candy Crush clone.

  • @Octopus1348@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    216 months ago

    Let’s talk about this stupid “Let’s put a useless white background under our icons” trend.

    Be honest, which looks better?

  • @kidney_bean@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    186 months ago

    I liked the new Firefox logo when it came out, but I think now I would appreciate it if logos became a little more sophisticated again.