Crops can blight, animals can get diseases. I don't know much about hydroponics but I know that bacteria are a concern. What food source is the most reliable, the least likely to produce less food than expected?

  • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I know you’re not really being serious, but it doesn’t really. I considered the logistics of this for an RP I was running and it doesn’t add up. You need way way way way more food to grow a human being than the human being provides in food when they’re dead. At most, being very very generous, you could meet 1% of a society’s food needs with cannibalism. And that’s a really high estimate. It’s really more of a special treat than a daily diet!

      • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s so inefficient you may as well just leave the population to starve, nearly the same effect for much less work!

        • You're going to have people anyway, and they're going to die. We just need a process to make their deaths a d resulting disposal as productive as possible. We could set an optimum age limit; maybe gameify the process, and package it with respect and nobility. We could give it a pleasant name - something like "Carousel" maybe.

          We're looking for balance, not a Buddhist sort of minimal impact.